Beyond the aesthetics
The impact of this screen time isn’t just confined to the cinema. For cities, film production offers far more than a fleeting moment of Hollywood glamour. Productions bring direct economic benefits: jobs for local crews, income from location hire, and spending across hotels, restaurants, and logistics. 
But its cultural legacy often endures much longer. Cities that appear on screen frequently enjoy a surge in “set-jetting” tourism. Northern Ireland is a prime example: its transformation into Westeros for Game of Thrones has generated more than £250 million in tourism revenue, with fans still travelling years later to experience filming sites firsthand. 
In this sense, film acts as both an economic catalyst and a storytelling tool, reframing how cities are perceived internationally. 
Another advantage lies in scale. British city centres are compact and controllable compared to sprawling American metropolises. That makes them not only versatile in appearance but also practical for filmmaking. 
This was particularly evident post-lockdown when many productions rewrote scripts to avoid large crowd scenes and looked for film-friendly alternatives closer to home. 
Mission Impossible 7, for example, forwent Venice in favour of Oxfordshire, while Netflix’s The Witcher relocated scenes from the Czech Republic to Wales and the West Country.
 
When British streets stand in for New York or Paris it’s more than a cinematic trick – it highlights how well-designed, adaptable places can capture imaginations worldwide. For cities, that translates into pride, profile, and long-term value; for the property world, it underlines the enduring importance of heritage, design and placemaking.